Higgs discovery at LHC was a giant step for experimenters (and possibly spacetime geometers) but a small one (up to now) for theoreticians
What elementary particle physics program following the 13 TeV scale probing?
A possibly naive answer to this important question can be found at the end of this post. But let us start with a more reliable view from a beloved high energy physics blogger currently silent on his website but still tweeting when he doesn't whistle:
The possibility that the LHC will only further confirm the Standard Model is often referred to as the nightmare scenario. The puzzles that emerge are not the nightmare; physicists love difficult problems. On the contrary, it is the indefinite persistence of the current confusing situation that is considered nightmarish.The most efficient method developed thus far for revealing the fundamental secrets of nature has been to increase beam energy to probe increasingly small distances. Larger and more powerful colliders are seen as the solution. The design and construction of the LHC was a gargantuan task that required decades of work and billions of dollars. Such an undertaking will only become more difficult in the future. Would a doubling of energy be sufficient for any new collider project? Is a factoroften increase needed? It may be the case that the answers we seek are to be found at energy levels that are simply unattainable for the foreseeable future. It is also unclear whether a bigger collider would resolve currently unanswered questions...
As was the case with the space program following the moon landing, there is on the one hand a grandiose plan, and on the other, more modest proposals with clear goals. There are two ways to investigate matter at very small scales. The first is to channel vast energies into a small volume, so that it can be converted into the creation of new particles. This is the most straightforward method and results can be interpreted with minimal ambiguity.
The second approach involves taking advantage of the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics. According to this principle, very heavy particles can be continuously created from a vacuum. These particles exist for a short time, during which they may affect the behavior of known particles, such as electrons, muons, Higgs bosons, and so on. By measuring the properties of known particles with great precision, and comparing the results to theoretical predictions, insights can be derived into physical laws at energies inaccessible to collider experiments.
Many such experiments are currently being conducted. Examples include research into the magnetic and electric properties of elementary and composite particles, such as muons, tau leptons, protons, neutrons, and kaons. The MEG, Muon g2, nEDM, NA62, and Qweak experiments, among others, indirectly probe physics at energies well above what can be reached at the LHC, or, for that matter, a future onehundredkilometer collider. In many cases, a modest budget can improve precision by orders of magnitude within just a few years. Precision experiments also touch upon many distinct areas of physics—atomic physics, laser physics, condensed matter physics, and nuclear physics—promoting collaboration between particle physics and other domains of science...
Which is it to be: a onehundredkilometer collider, or one hundred precision experiments at CERN? This is a serious question. Not only the future but possibly the survival of particle physics is at stake. Shifting the focus away from highenergy colliders toward precision experiments may be the most efficient way to continue exploration of fundamental interactions in the decades ahead. It may even allow particle physics to emerge stronger from its current crisis.
Adding a usual advisory and this blog's obstinate reminder
The LHC experiment is not yet done—far from it. The collider is scheduled to operate for another fifteen years, accumulating something like one hundred times more data than it has to date. Physicists will be scrutinizing the data for any signs of new particles. The Higgs boson will be studied with an eye towards determining how well it conforms to the specific predictions of the Standard Model. A breakthrough may happen at any moment...
Reading the next quote, one may add to what Adam wrote: a breakthrough has already happened but it has yet to be granted as it did not occured at CERN but on the operatoralgebraicclad peaks of the quantum geometric models of spacetime, a place where "oxygen" (physics intuition) is naturally scarce.
The noncommutative geometry dictated by physics is the product of the ordinary 4dimensional continuum by a finite noncommutative geometry which appears naturally from the classification of finite geometries of KOdimension equal to 6 modulo 8 (cf. [8, 11]). The compatibility of the model with the measured value of the Higgs mass was demonstrated in [13] due to the role in the renormalization of {an ultraheavy Higgslike singlet} scalar field already present in {our model before Higgs discovery}[12]. In [14, 15], with Chamseddine and Mukhanov, we gave the conceptual explanation of the finite noncommutative geometry from Clifford algebras and obtained a higher form of the Heisenberg commutation relations between p and q, whose irreducible Hilbert space representations correspond to 4dimensional spin geometries. The role of p is played by the Dirac operator and the role of q by the Feynman slash of coordinates using Clifford algebras. The proof that all spin geometries are obtained relies on deep results of immersion theory and ramified coverings of the sphere. The volume of the 4dimensional geometry is automatically quantized by the index theorem; and the spectral model, taking into account the inner automorphisms due to the noncommutative nature of the Clifford algebras, gives Einstein gravity coupled with a slight extension of the standard model, which is a PatiSalam model. This model was shown in our joint work with A. Chamseddine and W. van Suijlekom [17, 18] to yield unification of coupling constants.
Alain Connes (Submitted on 7 Mar 2017)
Building a new articulation of quantum matter and gauge interactions through an updated spacetime geometry to forge new experimental tools with the Higgs scalar boson ruler!
This is my "educated" guess, based on the spectral noncommutative geometric insight exposed above and also inspired from the epistemological hindsight developped described by the late french mathematician and philosopher Gilles Châtelet below:
Toute physique mathématique est fondée par un protocole d'articulation du sens géométrique et du sens physique... Pourquoi donc préférer {la} certitude ... [que {je} peux refermer {mon} poing sur l'électron qui est là devant moi par la simple connaissance de sa positionvitesse] à la richesse de l'algèbre des observables qui en dit beaucoup plus sur le jeu expérimental : symétrie, compatibilité de certaines pratiques, règles de jeu de mesures... Les relations d'incertitudes ... sont à appréhender ... comme le simple refus du physique à se donner par saisie cartésienne {commutative}. Celleci est impuissante à comprendre les rôles, les places, les intrigues du théâtre ... quantique.
Gilles Châtelet
Will the LHC bring physicists "closer to the moon", namely to a grand unification of fundamental interactions, while no sign of new "natural physics" shows up aside the Higgs boson? A positive answer could rely on the building of a new natural spacetime model offering a proper geometric interpretation to the scalar particle discovered by the LHC. The spectral model of particle physics is a quite successfull example of such a program that learnt the lesson from the 125 GeV mass measured in 2012. It recently led to put in place a possible foundation stone to clarify the issue of quantising spacetime and it is based on the formalism that made it possible to quantise radiation and matter. Last but not least it establishes a logical link with mimetic dark matter and dark energy models.
(Background picture from the CERN image library shows the area under which the tunnel for LHC can be found near to Geneva and lac Leman. The French Alps with Mont Blanc provides a natural backdrop and a reminder for the past discovery of particles like positron, muon, meson, kaon...that occured in high altitude cosmic ray laboratories. The drawing is the currently experimentally proven and conceptually understood version of the grand loop of physics).
//last edit June

Comments
Post a Comment
Cherère lecteurtrice, le blogueur espère que ce billet vous a sinon interessée du moins interpellée donc, si le coeur vous en dit, osez partager avec les autres internautes comme moi vos commentaires éclairés !
Dear reader, the blogger hopes you have been interested by his post or have noticed something (ir)relevant, then if you are in the mood, do not hesitate to share with other internauts like me your enlightened opinion !